What Is My One-Rep Max if I Lift 315 lb for 3 Reps?

315 lb for 3 reps, run through all seven published formulas — median 343 lb, and the 25 lb they disagree by shown rather than hidden.

Estimated one-rep max343lb

median of seven formulas — the full range is 334 to 359 lb

Lowest of the seven 334 lb
Highest of the seven 359 lb
Your set was 92% of max

The set you actually did
lb
Units

The formulas are ratios, so the unit only changes the label — 225 kg for 5 works exactly like 225 lb for 5.

Every one-rep-max formula applied to this set
FormulaEquationEstimate
Brzycki 334 lb
O'Conner 339 lb
Lander 338 lb
Wathan 343 lb
Epley 347 lb
Lombardi 352 lb
Mayhew 359 lb

Fitted on sets of 2 to 10 reps. Above 10 the estimates drift apart and none of them is dependable.

This calculator needs JavaScript to recalculate. The answer shown above was worked out when the page was built and is correct for the date in the address bar.

Last checked

343 lb works out to 3x45 + 1x10 + 1x5 per side plus the bar — call it 345 lb in practice, since gyms rarely stock the odd change. 3 reps sits at the reliable end of the range these formulas were fitted on, so the 25 lb spread here is about as tight as the method gets. Your 315 lb set represents about 92% of the estimated max.

Why 3 reps gives a tight estimate

A triple is close to the best case for this method. The low end of the two-to-ten band is where these regressions were sampled most heavily, and it shows here — the seven land within 25 lb of each other, 7.3% of the estimate, which is small enough that choosing a different formula would not change how you train. If the third rep slowed down but the bar never stalled, 343 lb is a defensible working number.

Training loads from a 343 lb max

Programmes are written as percentages of the max, not as absolute weights. From 343 lb, rounded to the nearest 5 lb:

PercentageLoadTypical set
95%325 lbHeavy single
90%310 lbDoubles and triples
85%290 lbSets of four to five
80%275 lbSets of six
75%255 lbSets of eight
70%240 lbVolume work, ten or more

343 lb is 3x45 + 1x10 + 1x5 per side plus the bar, 345 lb loaded. At this load the 25 lb the formulas disagree by is bigger than a pair of 10s, which is a good argument for programming off the lower estimate — 334 lb — and letting the bar prove you wrong rather than the other way round. Warm-up jumps also get long here; work up in percentages rather than in fixed plate increments.

The formulas behind this answer, and their limitations

The table above the fold is Epley (1985), Brzycki (1993), Lombardi (1989), O'Conner (1989), Wathan (1994), Lander (1985) and Mayhew (1992), each applied to 315 lb for 3 reps; the headline figure is their median. All seven assume a set taken close to failure with clean technique. At 3 reps you are inside the band they were fitted on, so the largest error here is not the equation but judging how close your set really was to failure — three reps left in the tank reads exactly the same to them. They also under-rate strong, experienced lifters, who hold a higher percentage of max at any rep count than the regression average. The full account — the populations behind each equation, what a bounced rep does to it, and why we stop at ten reps — is set out on the methodology page. Warm up thoroughly and use safety bars or a spotter before going anywhere near 343 lb. This is a training estimate, not medical advice.

Common questions

315 lb for 3 reps is what one-rep max?

About 343 lb. The seven standard formulas range from 334 to 359 lb on these inputs, so the honest answer is “somewhere around 343”. In practice that is 3x45 + 1x10 + 1x5 per side plus the bar, or 345 lb loaded. Your 315 lb set is roughly 92% of that estimated max.

Why do the seven formulas disagree by 25 lb?

Each was fitted on a different group of lifters doing a different lift, so they curve differently as reps climb. At 3 reps that comes to 7.3%. Most calculators pick one of the seven silently; the spread is itself information about how much the number deserves to be trusted. All seven written out.

Should I try to lift 343 lb?

Not on the strength of an estimate from a 3-rep set, and not cold. A short set gives the tightest estimate this method produces, but 343 lb is still an extrapolation from 315 lb — work up to it over several weeks rather than in one session. Make small jumps near the top, and set safety bars or use a spotter. If the point is to programme your training rather than to test, you do not need to attempt it at all — use the percentages above and adjust when your working sets start moving easily.