What Is My One-Rep Max if I Lift 385 lb for 3 Reps?

385 lb for 3 reps, run through all seven published formulas — median 420 lb, and the 31 lb they disagree by shown rather than hidden.

Estimated one-rep max420lb

median of seven formulas — the full range is 408 to 439 lb

Lowest of the seven 408 lb
Highest of the seven 439 lb
Your set was 92% of max

The set you actually did
lb
Units

The formulas are ratios, so the unit only changes the label — 225 kg for 5 works exactly like 225 lb for 5.

Every one-rep-max formula applied to this set
FormulaEquationEstimate
Brzycki 408 lb
O'Conner 414 lb
Lander 413 lb
Wathan 420 lb
Epley 424 lb
Lombardi 430 lb
Mayhew 439 lb

Fitted on sets of 2 to 10 reps. Above 10 the estimates drift apart and none of them is dependable.

This calculator needs JavaScript to recalculate. The answer shown above was worked out when the page was built and is correct for the date in the address bar.

Last checked

420 lb works out to 4x45 + 1x10 per side plus the bar — call it 425 lb in practice, since gyms rarely stock the odd change. 3 reps sits at the reliable end of the range these formulas were fitted on, so the 31 lb spread here is about as tight as the method gets. Your 385 lb set represents about 92% of the estimated max.

Why 3 reps gives a tight estimate

A triple is close to the best case for this method. The low end of the two-to-ten band is where these regressions were sampled most heavily, and it shows here — the seven land within 31 lb of each other, 7.4% of the estimate, which is small enough that choosing a different formula would not change how you train. If the third rep slowed down but the bar never stalled, 420 lb is a defensible working number.

Training loads from a 420 lb max

Programmes are written as percentages of the max, not as absolute weights. From 420 lb, rounded to the nearest 5 lb:

PercentageLoadTypical set
95%400 lbHeavy single
90%380 lbDoubles and triples
85%355 lbSets of four to five
80%335 lbSets of six
75%315 lbSets of eight
70%295 lbVolume work, ten or more

420 lb is 4x45 + 1x10 per side plus the bar, 425 lb loaded. At this load the 31 lb the formulas disagree by is bigger than a pair of 10s, which is a good argument for programming off the lower estimate — 408 lb — and letting the bar prove you wrong rather than the other way round. Warm-up jumps also get long here; work up in percentages rather than in fixed plate increments.

The formulas behind this answer, and their limitations

The table above the fold is Epley (1985), Brzycki (1993), Lombardi (1989), O'Conner (1989), Wathan (1994), Lander (1985) and Mayhew (1992), each applied to 385 lb for 3 reps; the headline figure is their median. All seven assume a set taken close to failure with clean technique. At 3 reps you are inside the band they were fitted on, so the largest error here is not the equation but judging how close your set really was to failure — three reps left in the tank reads exactly the same to them. They also under-rate strong, experienced lifters, who hold a higher percentage of max at any rep count than the regression average. The full account — the populations behind each equation, what a bounced rep does to it, and why we stop at ten reps — is set out on the methodology page. Warm up thoroughly and use safety bars or a spotter before going anywhere near 420 lb. This is a training estimate, not medical advice.

Common questions

385 lb for 3 reps is what one-rep max?

About 420 lb. The seven standard formulas range from 408 to 439 lb on these inputs, so the honest answer is “somewhere around 420”. In practice that is 4x45 + 1x10 per side plus the bar, or 425 lb loaded. Your 385 lb set is roughly 92% of that estimated max.

Why do the seven formulas disagree by 31 lb?

Each was fitted on a different group of lifters doing a different lift, so they curve differently as reps climb. At 3 reps that comes to 7.4%. Most calculators pick one of the seven silently; the spread is itself information about how much the number deserves to be trusted. All seven written out.

Should I try to lift 420 lb?

Not on the strength of an estimate from a 3-rep set, and not cold. A short set gives the tightest estimate this method produces, but 420 lb is still an extrapolation from 385 lb — work up to it over several weeks rather than in one session. Make small jumps near the top, and set safety bars or use a spotter. If the point is to programme your training rather than to test, you do not need to attempt it at all — use the percentages above and adjust when your working sets start moving easily.